A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Tuesday 31 July 2012

DFA to summon Cambodian envoy [Another Cambodian undiplomatic diplomat summoned by the Philippines' Department of Foreign Affairs]

By Pia Lee-Brago 
The Philippine Star,
Updated July 31, 2012 

 MANILA, Philippines - The Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) will summon Cambodia’s top diplomat in the Philippines and ask him to explain his accusation that “dirty politics” was behind the “inflexible and non-negotiable” position of the Philippines and Vietnam on the inclusion of the West Philippine Sea dispute with China in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) agenda in its 45th ministerial meeting recently.
Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario said yesterday DFA Undersecretary for Policy Erlinda Basilio is set to hand a note verbale today to Ambassador Hos Sereythonh to protest the allegations he made in his letter-to-the-editor published in The STAR. The Philippines and Vietnam had vigorously pushed for a common ASEAN stand on China’s incursions in the West Philippine Sea.
“He is being summoned this afternoon and be presented a note verbale,” Del Rosario said.
Basilio said the ambassador was originally summoned to appear yesterday but begged off for health reasons.
The DFA defended Basilio from Hos’ accusation that she had tried to manipulate, distort and exaggerate developments in the West Philippine Sea involving China in order to make her case.
Hos had also claimed that Basilio’s article “What happened in Phnom Penh?” represented the country’s official position.
DFA spokesman Raul Hernandez said Basilio is “a professional diplomat with an unblemished record of nearly 50 years of service to the country.”
“Her statements were objective, factual and true. More importantly, Undersecretary Basilio was present in all the meetings in Phnom Penh. The Cambodian ambassador was not,” Hernandez told The STAR.


Cambodia, which hosted the recent ASEAN meeting, opposed the discussion of the Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal issue and its inclusion in the grouping’s joint communiqué.
The Philippines and other ASEAN members deplored the non-issuance of a joint communiqué, which was unprecedented in the regional bloc’s 45-year existence.
“We will be giving a note verbale which includes our protest. We are going to summon the Cambodian ambassador to ask him to explain what he meant when he stated that the ‘inflexible and non-negotiable position of two countries of ASEAN is dirty politics’,” Hernandez added.
Hernandez said that strangely, Cambodia appointed a committee, which included Philippines and Vietnam, to form consensus on a final draft for an ASEAN stand.
“Upon a series of many negotiations, at least five final drafts achieved a consensus. Notwithstanding authority granted the committee, all final drafts were disapproved by the chair,” he said.
The DFA said the ambassador would be asked to reveal where he obtained information on the events he narrated in his letter since his accounts were not consistent with the records of the ASEAN meetings.
“We also intend to show the Cambodian ambassador why the ASEAN chair was being viewed as unduly advancing a non-ASEAN country’s interest, with a clear prejudice to positions of the Philippines and Vietnam, members of ASEAN,” Hernandez said.
In his letter to the editor, Hos claimed that both the Philippines and Vietnam continued to insist from July 9 until the last day of the meeting on July 13 to include their national bilateral disputes with China in the joint communiqué.
“By doing so, the two countries wanted to sabotage and hijack the joint communiqué as well as the AMM, and to make them fail before the eyes of the ASEAN Dialogue Partners and the International Community. It was truly an un-ASEAN spirit of unity and solidarity,” he said.
He also claimed that Del Rosario stated during the meeting that the bilateral dispute between the Philippines and China was non-negotiable and insisted that it be included in the joint statement.
“In other words, the two countries demanded that ASEAN collectively must yield to the national interests of the Philippines and Vietnam, even if it is at the expense of ASEAN,” he said.
He claimed that Cambodia had to bear pressures from ASEAN claimant states to issue a joint statement on the situation in the West Philippine Sea or South China Sea.
Hos said that to ensure an ASEAN consensus, Cambodia wrote to all ASEAN foreign ministers to ask for responses in writing on the issue. But, after waiting for several weeks, he said it was clear that ASEAN had no consensus on the Panatag Shoal issue.
“Finally, to try to blame Cambodia, as the ASEAN chair, for what essentially was the inflexible and non-negotiable positions of the two countries of ASEAN is a dirty politics and therefore it should have no place in ASEAN,” Hos wrote.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

China will win and Cambodia did the right thing. The Phillipppine diplomat are the aggressor along with Vietnam.

Stick with China and Cambodia will be better off economically.

Take a look at what China can do to the phillipppine's trouble maker behavior. 1 millions boxes of phillipppine's banana were stuck in the Chinese shipping port container because of a certain delay excuse which I think related to the Island dispute.

Anonymous said...

Cambodia stuck with China in the 1970s and 2 million Cambodian were killed. So I think Cambodia should stick with America because other countries that stuck with America like Taiwan, Thailand, Israel, South Korea, Japan, Turkey, Singapore and so and so on.. are very successful.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I disagree 7,31,12@10:26Am,that said:
Philipphine was aggressor on the war of words between Cambodia and philiphine.Fact: The summit was over finger pint was over for a week after the summit.But Csmbodian ambassador kept picking the old wound till it bleeding,first started with Lady Yu Ay ambassador to Siam,then ambassador to philiphine started to pick a fight with philiphine again.Who was aggressor just to fair? Why don't Cambodia lets this die out ,why putting fuel on fire?

Ambassador of Cambodia were at false,just the summit itself,the host (Hun sen) was at false due to bias taking side behaviour that ruined 45th years friendship or divided Asian aparts or at least disappointment among asian's members states.Stop picking old wound Cambodia's ambassadors.